A few years ago, I requested on my weblog what individuals would like from Google’s free website owner sources. It’s fairly awesome to re-read that publish now, because we’ve provided on a lot of peoples’ demands.
At this point, our website owner system will aware you to guide webspam activities that will have an effect on your website. We’ve lately combined out better exposure on website protection problems, such as drastically enhanced sources for compromised website help. We’ve also enhanced the back-links that we display to marketers and online marketers. Along the way, we’ve also designed a website that describes how look for performs, and Google has done a multitude of “office hours” hangouts for websites. And we’re just about to hit 15 thousand opinions on ~500 different website owner video clips.
So here is my question: what would you like to see from Webmaster Tools (or the bigger team) in 2014? I’ll toss out a few concepts below, but please keep recommendations in content. Keep in mind that I’m not appealing we’ll do any of these–this is just to get your psychological mindset going.
Some things that I could think about individuals wanting:
Make it easier/faster to declare authorship or do authorship markup.
Improved confirming of junk, insects, mistakes, or problems. Maybe individuals who do very good junk reviews could be “deputized” so their upcoming junk reviews would be fast-tracked. Or perhaps a seo, cred, or peer-based program could percolate up the most important problems, bad look for results, etc.
Option to obtain the websites that Google has seen from your website, in case a disaster like a hard disk failing or a malware takes down your whole website.
Checklists or help for new companies that are just beginning out.
Periodic reviews with guidance on enhancing places like cellular or page rate.
Send Google “fat pings” of material before posting it on the web, to learn effectively for Google to tell where material showed up first on the web.
Better sources for discovering or confirming copy material or scrapers.
Show webpages that do not confirm.
Show the resource webpages that weblink to your 404 webpages, so you can contact other websites and ask if they want to fix their damaged hyperlinks.
Or almost as nice: tell the webpages on your website that cause to 404s or damaged hyperlinks, so that online marketers can fix their own damaged hyperlinks.
Better or quicker large url elimination (maybe webpages that coordinate a particular phrase?).
Refreshing the current information in Webmaster Tools quicker or better.
Improve spiders.txt checker to deal with even longer data files.
Ways for online marketers to tell us more about their site: anything from country-level information to terminology to authorship to what cms (CMS) you use on different places of the website. That might help Google enhance how it crawls different places of a sector.
To be clear, this is just some personal brainstorming–I’m not saying that the Webmaster Tools group will work on any of these. What I’d really like to listen to is what you would like to see in 2014, either in Webmaster Tools or from the bigger group that performs with website owners and online marketers.
At this point, our website owner system will aware you to guide webspam activities that will have an effect on your website. We’ve lately combined out better exposure on website protection problems, such as drastically enhanced sources for compromised website help. We’ve also enhanced the back-links that we display to marketers and online marketers. Along the way, we’ve also designed a website that describes how look for performs, and Google has done a multitude of “office hours” hangouts for websites. And we’re just about to hit 15 thousand opinions on ~500 different website owner video clips.
So here is my question: what would you like to see from Webmaster Tools (or the bigger team) in 2014? I’ll toss out a few concepts below, but please keep recommendations in content. Keep in mind that I’m not appealing we’ll do any of these–this is just to get your psychological mindset going.
Some things that I could think about individuals wanting:
Make it easier/faster to declare authorship or do authorship markup.
Improved confirming of junk, insects, mistakes, or problems. Maybe individuals who do very good junk reviews could be “deputized” so their upcoming junk reviews would be fast-tracked. Or perhaps a seo, cred, or peer-based program could percolate up the most important problems, bad look for results, etc.
Option to obtain the websites that Google has seen from your website, in case a disaster like a hard disk failing or a malware takes down your whole website.
Checklists or help for new companies that are just beginning out.
Periodic reviews with guidance on enhancing places like cellular or page rate.
Send Google “fat pings” of material before posting it on the web, to learn effectively for Google to tell where material showed up first on the web.
Better sources for discovering or confirming copy material or scrapers.
Show webpages that do not confirm.
Show the resource webpages that weblink to your 404 webpages, so you can contact other websites and ask if they want to fix their damaged hyperlinks.
Or almost as nice: tell the webpages on your website that cause to 404s or damaged hyperlinks, so that online marketers can fix their own damaged hyperlinks.
Better or quicker large url elimination (maybe webpages that coordinate a particular phrase?).
Refreshing the current information in Webmaster Tools quicker or better.
Improve spiders.txt checker to deal with even longer data files.
Ways for online marketers to tell us more about their site: anything from country-level information to terminology to authorship to what cms (CMS) you use on different places of the website. That might help Google enhance how it crawls different places of a sector.
To be clear, this is just some personal brainstorming–I’m not saying that the Webmaster Tools group will work on any of these. What I’d really like to listen to is what you would like to see in 2014, either in Webmaster Tools or from the bigger group that performs with website owners and online marketers.
No comments:
Post a Comment